Says parents in other developed countries across the world |
Whilst
perusing the internet I came across an alarming trend in cities across the US: bans on the feeding of homeless people. You think I’m joking? I wish I
was. It sounds like something we’d expect from other countries like…nowhere
else, ever. We spend billions in aid to assist “developing nations” across the world,
in hopes of supplying them with education, food, medical assistance, and democracy
– yet more than 50 million Americans (including myself) are uninsured, our
public education system has quickly eroded over the last decade (in my opinion
due to the coveted “No Child Left Behind Act”, but that’s for another discussion)
and poverty in America is at an all time high in decades. As the federal government looks to cut back on social programs such as welfare and food stamps, the local governments are implementing budget cuts for education and prohibiting the homeless from being fed by charitable citizens who want to help a fellow countryman.
While
I was living in Philadelphia last year for 10 months, a few things happened. A
homeless shelter that housed up to 300 men was shut down apparently due to lack of
funding. African-American, democrat Mayor Michael Nutter implemented a
law banning the feeding of homeless people in public parks and the Ben Franklin
Parkway, because he claimed it made the city lose dignity. Philadelphia also
initiated shutting down dozens of schools over the next two years. According to this Article “Philadelphia's School
Reform Commission voted…to close 23 city schools and merge or relocate five
others” for the coming 2013-2014 school year. This means more than 14,000 inner
city students are at risk of going from a mediocre educational atmosphere to one that would be abysmal
at best since thousands of teachers will be laid off, resources will dwindle
and class sizes will increase. Also a few years before I moved to Philadelphia,
Mayor Nutter attempted to shut down 11 of the cities libraries, and lay off many
librarians, but thankfully his efforts were thwarted by a City Council with
common sense.
What
I gather from the leadership in Philadelphia is they don’t want educated
citizens (trying to close down libraries and schools), they want homeless
people to go hungry (banning people from feeding them in public locations),
they want homeless people out of the shelters, which costs money and perhaps into
prisons, which would make money. This spring the Philadelphia powers that be announced
the city would spend $2.3 million on land acquisition for a new prison. It was reported that mid April the prison system was holding 8,897 people, when it was built to
hold only 6,500 inmates. Instead of
educating the youth of Philadelphia and providing programs to support those in
need, Philadelphia has made minority groups and those in in the lower socioeconomic bracket a cash cow for
big businesses that thrive in the correctional facility industry.
Philadelphia
is not the only American city to ban the feeding of the homeless in public
areas. In 2006, Las Vegas became the first major US city to pass a law like
this, and for the record, Las Vegas’ homeless population has doubled in the
past decade to about 12,000 people. According
to this New York Times article the Las Vegas ordinance bans the “providing of food or meals to the indigent
for free or for a nominal fee.” It then explains that “an indigent person is a
person whom a reasonable, ordinary person would believe to be entitled to apply
for or receive [public assistance].” How could one define an ordinary person? I
know I am not ordinary by any means. I am also not destitute. As a teacher,
after being taxed by the city of Philadelphia, PA, NJ and federal taxes, as
well as paying expenses necessary to live, I was lucky to have $30 in my pocket
at the end of each month. Then I either spent my savings on my students or my foster
kittens. Violating Las Vegas’ anti-homeless ordinance by providing food of any
kind to a person deemed “indigent” is punishable by a fine of $1,000 or a jail
sentence of up to 6 months...or both. Bingo! The city is cashing in on people’s
good will by either making them pay for a permit to feed the homeless, or the
alternative of making them pay a fine, or go to jail. Hello new source of
revenue, how are you today?
The city of Orlando,
Florida, home of Walt Disney World, aka the “happiest place on Earth” also
enacted a law in 2006 that mandated permits for groups distributing food in
parks within two miles of City Hall. In 2011, twelve members of a food activist group called “Food Not Bombs” were
arrested in Orlando “for giving free food to groups of homeless people in a
downtown park” because they were “acting in defiance” of the city ordinance. According
to the law, “Each group is allowed two permits per park per year” and Food Not
Bombs had exceeded their permit limit, so by setting up their food tables for
the homeless they were breaking the law and risked being swept away to prison.
“I’m here because I murdered someone, what are you in for?”
"I’m
here because I gave a peanut butter and jelly sandwich to the homeless”
"Oh,
you’re a danger to society! Stay away from this guy!”
As
major cities across America (such as the cities I mentioned above, and also Dallas,
Houston, New York City, etc.) are increasingly preventing kind souls from
feeding the homeless in parks or other locations a larger problem is brewing.
Food
stamps are a thing of the past. The US government now has a program
cleverly referred to as “SNAP”, or the more long winded version known as the “Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program,” which supplies debit cards instead of stamps or coupons. Last week the Farm Bill, which incorporates
how the SNAP program functions was heavily debated. Ultimately, the House bill
is now going to be cut by $2.5 billion a year, which is about a 3% trimming of
the program. This program is relied upon by about 1 in 7 Americans, and now as
many as three million Americans in need would be cut off from food assistance.
According to Dorothy Rosenbaum and Stacy Dean of the Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, these major cuts will "cause significant hardship to
several million low-income households," including “280,000 children from
low-income families [who] will lose access to free school lunch.” Entirely due
to the plummeting economy over the last several years, the number of people who
have relied on food stamps (SNAP) increased 70% only since 2007. After voting to drastically slash the budget
for SNAP Rep. Reid Ribble (that is seriously his name!), a republican from
Wisconsin said, "I want poor people to have food…I want children to eat
well." He certainly has a funny way of showing it!
Speaking
of children eating well, Arizona Rep. Jeff Flake, personally benefited from
social programs to assist the poor as he was growing up. He was a recipient of
the National School Lunch Program. Flake just so happened to be one of five
members of congress to vote against “reauthorizing funds for childhood
nutrition programs” in 2004. Now here’s the All-American dream...grow up as a poor
southern boy, work hard, become a politician to help serve those who don’t have a
voice by being a civil servant, and then take away the very avenues you had to
thrive in becoming a productive member of society. What you don’t have makes
you stronger, right Flakey boy? Such as a nutritious lunch provided for you by
the government. His government funded school lunches allowed him to
fully function in school, so he could go on and attend a Mormon college. Flake’s Mormon views have no doubt been the backbone
for his embarrassing voting record of trying to amend the U.S. Constitution to
ban same-sex marriage (because it’s against the Book of Mormon!) and trying to
ban the feeding of poor, hungry school children like he once was. I haven’t read the Book of Mormon,
but a quick Google search showed it was not against the Mormon religion to feed
poor children.
Rep.
Juan Vargas, a democrat from California used the Christian rhetoric that we
often hear from Conservatives against liberals by quoting the Bible in opposing
their insistence upon slashing a program that millions in America rely upon.
Vargas quoted the Book of Matthew by saying, "When I was hungry you gave me food. When I was thirsty, you
gave me drink." I can only imagine he did this to try and use the same jargon
Conservatives utilize for every other social issue at hand (Gay people are bad
because the bible says so!..Sexism is okay because the Bible says so!..Americans
deserve their right to bear arms because the bible says so?...)
During the discussion of not being
responsible for the poor in America, several Republicans talked about their
Christianity and said “the Bible encourages people to help each other but
doesn't dictate what the federal government should do.” Doug LaMalfa, a
California rep. went on to say "We should be doing this as individuals helping
the poor." I would say this is hypocrisy in the purist form. If this is so, then individuals should be able to feed
the homeless…and the governments should stay out of it. The Bible
does not specify word for word that the American Federal government should help thy neighbor;
therefore, the American Federal government will not help thy poor neighbor/constituents.
Unlike what most Christian Americans would like to believe, the Bible was not
written for just Americans, as a matter of fact the USA was not in existence
when the Bible was created. Side note: Jesus wasn’t White! (*gasp*)
Rep. Jim McGovern, a democrat from Massachusetts said, "Christians,
Jews, Muslims, whatever - we're failing our brothers and sisters here.” No
kidding.
Don’t ask don’t tell: Don’t ask me not to
feed homeless people, and then tell me you won’t do it because only individuals
should be helping the poor and not the government.
OxyMORON.
Whichever way you look at it, the government is trying
to prevent poor people from receiving food they need to survive. Whether
through individuals, groups or government aid, there are people who need help.
Making it illegal for people to help, alongside government cuts to food
assistance programs can be likened to handing out a death sentence or paving
the way to life in prison for stealing a loaf of bread. 24601
No comments:
Post a Comment